Listening Posts.

Discussion in 'Under Consideration' started by Chris0132', May 9, 2009.

  1. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The main thing I dislike about comm targets is it's annoying for the commander, they have to keep dropping shitloads of attack orders to keep you up to date, and new commanders tend to be pretty bad at this, and I tend to forget.

    I also figure that being able to drop them anywhere is what sucks, there's no supply chain involved, your territory should obviously give you the advantage, but the enemy territory should give them the advantage, you shouldn't all have wallhacks all the time, but you do need to know when people break through your lines or if people have snuck past and are setting up a base or something.

    To solve this conundrum, I present the listening post.


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    Basically these things can be dropped by the commander and function like a combined camera and radar, but with a wider range, I'm thinking half the radar range of a big radar, and two thirds of that would also function as a camera. They have about as much health as an armory and cost 150 res a pop.

    Commander group attack orders are removed except for tanks, and they only work on tanks when they are within range of one of these or a radar, or if someone can see them, basically if tanks disappear from view they lose their targets.

    However, dropping a few of these will still allow players to see where enemy targets are, it just removes the need for comms to constnantly redrop them and also allows comms to monitor more territory.

    So, comments?
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2009
  2. sergeant mkoll

    sergeant mkoll Member

    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hate commanders being able to give everyone wallhacks all the time at no resource cost
    So sounds like a good idea
     
  3. LordDz

    LordDz Capitan Rainbow Flowers

    Messages:
    5,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hate when people blame the commander for getting shoot due no targets..
    So I like.
     
  4. Demented

    Demented Member

    Messages:
    2,337
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hate commander attack orders in general.

    I don't like this much better, but eh, at least it's better.
     
  5. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well yes the whole idea of wallhacks needs some rethinking, but I don't think cutting it out alltogether is a good idea, because people do need some way of knowing where enemies are.

    This just addresses the problem of it being a tedious and annoying job for the commander as well as a complete noob trap for new comms.
     
  6. Sneaky

    Sneaky Member

    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'll take anything that limits wallhacks, and these look like they make good targets for scouts with radar stealth.
     
  7. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah they would, you could probably get away with allowing radar stealth to bypass these. So scouts can shut down enemy sensor coverage.

    Although you would need to prevent them dying to sabotage too easily because they would be such prime targets, as well as make them easy to fix, because I can't imagine many engineers going round fixing all the posts.
     
  8. -Mayama-

    -Mayama- MANLY MAN BITCH

    Messages:
    6,487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Should be very, very vulnerable.
    Like a turret for example.
     
  9. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I wouldn't say THAT vulnerable, but certainly not as tough as a regular building.

    Maybe twice the health of a turret, it is quite large after all and relatively expensive.

    Of course you can hide them in corners but they do need to resist weapons fire somewhat.

    You could make them susceptable to concussion grenades however.

    You'd place these like turrets, but less often. I'd imagine them as being half way between building and turret.

    Improved model:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2009
  10. Jonat

    Jonat Member

    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I like this idea and the model looks awesome. Would this be the BE variant?
     
  11. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'll make the NF one soon, maybe tonight.
     
  12. Cyber-Kun

    Cyber-Kun Member

    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I approve.
    Makes sense and would be less stupid for new commanders.
     
  13. SirSnipes

    SirSnipes Member

    Messages:
    862
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    approved by me
     
  14. Jephir

    Jephir ALL GLORY TO THE JEPHIR

    Messages:
    1,409
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm still for the removal of commander attack orders, but this is a decent alternative.
     
  15. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]

    NF one will look like that more or less.
     
  16. Mr.Bungles

    Mr.Bungles Member

    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i have to say, they look pretty cool, and sound like they would be of quite a good use.
     
  17. Mashav

    Mashav Member

    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How about it gets upgraded with lvl 2 and 3 research?

    lvl 1=
    HP = turret
    range= lvl1 turret range
    Refreshes targets= 5 seconds

    lvl2
    HP = turret +50%
    range= lvl2 turret range
    Refreshes targets= 4 seconds

    lvl3
    HP = turret x2
    range= lvl3 turret range
    Refreshes targets= 3 seconds

    Maybe add on some marking or just change height to symbolize the differences.

    Also, I would like some kind of comm targets still in. Maybe when someone is in range of one of these towers you can target them. Whenever they get marked by the tower the person who was targeted have the red diamond pop up on them instead of the faint orange one. It would just make the targeted people distinguishable from the other marked people. It would come off if they're not in any surveillance range.

    And under what restriction would they go? building or turret? I really don't want me using these everywhere to impact how much i can build.

    Other then those, sounds good
     
  18. Vessboy

    Vessboy Member

    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    we already have levels.
    Engy camera/radar
    This
    The Radar

    Upgrading would just make things messy
     
  19. Ikalx

    Ikalx Member

    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One thing that sounded kinda interesting (from mashav's post) was if it had a refresh rate - if the targets phased in and out every five seconds like we (used to?) have for cameras. Just throwing that in there.

    I don't particularly like this idea or dislike it...not having to do commander targets is good, just...not sure. Something funny about it....tssk nevermind me.

    Oh, love the model btw ^^
     
  20. Alceister

    Alceister Member

    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think that comm targeting should be relegated to squad leaders.
     

Share This Page