So I'm addicted to Crack.. I was gonna make a thread called that but I feel like I've made enough shit threads lately
[nazi mode] In science, a fact is a verifiable and objective observation. A scientific theory is a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena. [/nazi mode] Derrr
Unless your theory is verifiable and based on objective observation then it isn't a theory, it's an untested hypothesis. So your distinction is stupid, because all theories must be factual.
Math is not able to solve the meaning of the universe for us. Scientist wanted computers to attempt to find the meaning of the universe but since computers have no logic and only apply math, they are unable to. That is why it is so incomplete.
wtf? Is its saying you can have a perfect theorem that is correct but, you can't prove it thus making it imperfect? Give my head a break and translate that shit. Chris I know you read that shit give me a breakdown of it plez.
I don't read that shit, why would I read that shit? I hate theory. On face value the idea that maths (which is enitrely INVENTED by humans) can be somehow incomplete is a bit hard to understand. If you make something up it stops where you say it does surely.
well I was pretty sure that a theory saying 1+1=2 had to be correct but now that guy says that I can't prove it thus its wrong.
It can't be a theory if it can't be proven wrong. Like the theory of gravity, to prove it right and shove it into Mel Gibson's face you would have to test every single apple in the world and see if they fall down.