Budget armor, RIP or a new life?

Yeah, wasn't sure rpg's velocity actually worked because that's a different name then what's in the vehicle weapon but it does work. The strangest thing though, you'd think with abs having basically a flat resist it would do equal damage to all sides of a tank, but it doesn't.

Actually after a bit of testing which side is irrelevant. Can't tell if it's travel time or if simply shooting it at an angle is the cause, maybe even curving the missile?, might be gravity(the most likely answer), but you can do just a tad more damage, or less it's not like I have an exact number to see how much an rpg is doing, but the amount is rather small so it's probably not the hugest of deals.

Does explosion force affect damage? I thought that was simply how much force an explosion puts on objects. It's why nukes can pop up one side of a tank.

 

It's not clear to me who stands where on the issue, so I added a poll for a simple yes/no. You can assume that when we remove it, we will change glycencity's armour to something else. (compo?)

 

If it isn't going to be made a passive research then get rid of it, no one will bother actively getting it.

The other option is from a qoute from me.

For me this isn't a simple yes or no because I do think there's alternatives.

 

That sounds completely fair. I'll take it.

 

Stop looking at plates, the plates mean nothing. For a comparison reactive is 120 a plate and abs is 60, if you have a bunch of leftover wight you could do something with it's wasted, which is why abs is actually one of the worse armor for lights. Abs's weight hasn't been changed in forever either, it's just other armors had their weight lowered or hp increased, or both.

 

which is bullshit. plates are the only ingame representation of armor strength. plates should mean everything.