READ THIS: Top 10 things that will never be implemented

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by Headshotmaster, Feb 20, 2010.

  1. Headshotmaster

    Headshotmaster Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    To clarify, these are things the developers will never do/change/remove/add/modify.

    Add Aircraft/Blimps
    - Engine Limitation.

    Adding Boats/Docks
    - Engine Limitations(relatively small maps).

    Add Bots/NPC's
    - Bot's become characters, and detract from the focus PC's.

    Changing "turret" to "turrent".
    - Learn to spell

    Remove Artillery
    - Artillery serve a function. Most problems with the artillery can be solved with a change, rather than a complete removal.

    Remove commander targets
    - Allows the Commander to relay information directly to his troops.

    Remove the commander
    - It's an RTS for fucks sakes. This idea is just plain stupid.

    Remove the scout
    - Scouts serve a function. Most problems can be addressed though modification.

    Give the commander a tank cannon
    - The command Vehicle is not a tank. Period.

    Official Parachutes
    - It's a fun server plugin, but it would break most maps. It also removes fall damage. It's already available through SM plugins.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2010
  2. Beerdude26

    Beerdude26 OnThink(){ IsDownYet(); }

    Messages:
    7,243
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is such troll bait for another unmentioned feature
     
  3. Brutos

    Brutos Administrator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I disagree on:
    :D
     
  4. Headshotmaster

    Headshotmaster Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seriously, learn to spell.
     
  5. LordDz

    LordDz Capitan Rainbow Flowers

    Messages:
    5,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So.. How long until we will see those changes? :)
     
  6. Headshotmaster

    Headshotmaster Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Never?
     
  7. dizzyone

    dizzyone I've been drinking, heavily

    Messages:
    5,771
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    HE DIDN'T MENTION BLIMPS.
     
  8. Omneh

    Omneh Member

    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LASERS

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Beerdude26

    Beerdude26 OnThink(){ IsDownYet(); }

    Messages:
    7,243
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wait what did I mistype :<
     
  10. Headshotmaster

    Headshotmaster Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was a joke about "turrent" :<
     
  11. Reef

    Reef Member

    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd like to add that "bunkers" were discussed on multiple occasions and it will rather not be implemented as it would encourage turtling and impair dynamics.
     
  12. Meliarion

    Meliarion Member

    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is similar to the suggestion thread guidelines sticky, perhaps you should merge this into that.
     
  13. aaaaaa50

    aaaaaa50 Member

    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey, :headshot:, why don't you just stop trying to arbitrarily end the commander target discussion? Yes, the Commander does need to relay information to the team, but the current "system" is totally pathetic. When people talk about removing commander targets, people usually try and figure out what a real commander information system should work like. Your troll-baiting does absolutely nothing but shove your opinions in everyone else's faces.
     
  14. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Haha scouts serve a function.
     
  15. Headshotmaster

    Headshotmaster Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The devs agree about comm targets in one form or another. I put that in this thread so you guys would shut up about it.

    I mean, go ahead and discuss it, this thread isn't stopping you.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2010
  16. ScardyBob

    ScardyBob Member

    Messages:
    3,457
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, but on the other major Empires servers fall damage is nerfed anyways (its capped at something like 10). Parachutes would at least make sense.
     
  17. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't know how this thread got stickied since in these two it's clearly not showing a dev team consensus but the personal belief of HSM.
     
  18. Headshotmaster

    Headshotmaster Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  19. Brutos

    Brutos Administrator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wat Parachutes suck. No way that is ever going to happen.
     
  20. soundspawn

    soundspawn Member

    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There's a consensus, but what exactly to do about commander targets is debatable. Removing them outright is not happening.

    I repeat, they will not be removed outright.

    Once more, they are not going to be removed outright. A commander must be able to tell his infantry where an enemy is. Mindless box dragging may get cut/replaced/improved upon/made unneccessary, but...

    Commander Targets will not be removed outright.

    And parachutes do suck in serious games, but they are fun in fun games. The natural answer is to leave that up to the server.

    Commander Targets will not be removed outright.
     

Share This Page