attack order priority

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by FN198, Mar 31, 2013.

  1. FN198

    FN198 Member

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :rolleyes:
    1. fn points out a problem
    2. fn provides a solution to said problem
    3. non-factors thread shit
    4. jephir shoves the code at fn "if you want it that bad, you code it"
    5. trickster and neoony scoff
    6. fn codes the solution
    7. non-factors return
    8. thread shitting ensues
     
  2. ViroMan

    ViroMan Black Hole (*sniff*) Bully

    Messages:
    8,382
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol sounds about right.
     
  3. ImSpartacus

    ImSpartacus nerf spec plz

    Messages:
    8,598
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hmmmm, I don't think we've made him rage yet. Double time it, boys.
     
  4. Neoony

    Neoony Member

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    you kinda forgot that everybody absolutely ignored your first post in this thread...as you didnt provided any REAL solution until after me and security actually started to think about one...

    skipping the truth with big ego

    + respect for actually trying to code the solution
    - respect for all the bullshit around

    you are a good leader and strategist, but the big YOU is making me sad :pathetic:

    oh...btw...actually, are you aware that You are the one who took this thread down? ^^
     
  5. FN198

    FN198 Member

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    do you do anything other than thread shit with your value-less value judgements?
     
  6. Neoony

    Neoony Member

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    yeah, but you would have to take your head out of your own ass to see :rolleyes:
     
  7. .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329

    .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329 Member

    Messages:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Come on, FN, you instigated this.
     
  8. FN198

    FN198 Member

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and with great reason, no doubt. now why don't you just explain to me why it's better to handicap the commander as opposed to giving him tools that work in a much more logical fashion?
     
  9. A-z-K

    A-z-K Member

    Messages:
    3,241
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The only way I would think mass targets acceptable is if they functioned like engineer cameras with the delay (but improved, half way between the total accuracy of a sinlge target anf the engi cameras) and had some kind of cooldown. A general idea of your target location for flanking, etc and still takes the commander some skill to decide when to use it.

    IMO it should be a click on a location and it would ping that part of the map with an area of effect, the longer you hold the mouse button down the bigger the radius of the area of effect, but the cool down also increases, this adds depth/tactics and balance to its use and stops spamming which is not fun to do. Basically the comm can create an invisible camera in an area with a short duration, the range of the camera balanced against the cooldown for another, the radius would be visible to the comm, like when placing turrets, and once placed within it a clock style line would sweep around to show how long it has left. Perhaps even some kind of stamina type mechanic, something fun, thoughtful and engaging for the commander to do on the battle field.

    This could play along side single targets which can be issued effectively at the same time for when the commander actually needs something dead - prioritisation.

    There, I solved the whole problem. I've made my nub suggestion for the year.

    It was not fun when fighting a team that had constant crosshairs on you all game. Its ends up being entirely about twitch reflex when everyone has wall hacks and the commander didn't even need line of sight! It really made gren op as fuck too.
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2013
  10. Sgt.Security

    Sgt.Security Member

    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]
    This actually sounds good to implement.

    And yes, as I said, if targeting gets too OP, it would affect the FPS part of this game in a bad way.
     
  11. ImSpartacus

    ImSpartacus nerf spec plz

    Messages:
    8,598
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So I guess insta-built camera gets filed along with the other mythical com powers.
     
  12. flasche

    flasche Member Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    13,299
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    0
    but a-z-k isnt that a kids game mechanic? how dare you suggest such things ...

    :D
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2013
  13. A-z-K

    A-z-K Member

    Messages:
    3,241
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No serious objections from flasche - therefore implement immediately.
    :D
     
  14. FN198

    FN198 Member

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    like any of our opinions matter, anyways
     
  15. A-z-K

    A-z-K Member

    Messages:
    3,241
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    0
    thats the spirit
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page