attack order priority

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by FN198, Mar 31, 2013.

  1. FN198

    FN198 Member

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    suggestion: make it so when you assign mass attack orders the target that gets assigned is always the
    • closest enemy to the group of friendlies you have selected
     
  2. YouzY

    YouzY Member

    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Make it so that you can squadtarget people using squadhide
     
  3. Sgt.Security

    Sgt.Security Member

    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    0
    YouzY replies, OMG.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2013
  4. .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329

    .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329 Member

    Messages:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would personally like to see this implemented.
     
  5. flasche

    flasche Member Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    13,299
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    0
    make it a special huge red arrow target for standard hide
     
  6. Beerdude26

    Beerdude26 OnThink(){ IsDownYet(); }

    Messages:
    7,243
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't understand, do you mean you want to be able to squad target people while using squad hide? Does it uncloak you or something?
     
  7. Trickster

    Trickster Retired Developer

    Messages:
    16,576
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He means target OTHER people who are using squad hide if you manage to spot them. I'm neutral on the idea.
     
  8. D.D.D. Destroyer

    D.D.D. Destroyer Member Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    9,509
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Keep the target updated only if said target is seen by somebody?
     
  9. Sgt.Security

    Sgt.Security Member

    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    0
    code, code everywhere.
     
  10. Freaknovich

    Freaknovich Member

    Messages:
    341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Everyone in this threat is doing a great job at ignoring FN's suggestion.
     
  11. complete_

    complete_ lamer

    Messages:
    6,438
    Likes Received:
    144
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i love threat
     
  12. FN198

    FN198 Member

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    it's the empiresmod forums

    when theres nothing in your post that they can disagree with, they will disagree with what you could have posted.
     
  13. Sgt.Security

    Sgt.Security Member

    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay fine, I am actually arsed to give you my first thought when I see this.

    Would you please give a better definition of "closest enemy to a group of people".. wut?

    BECAUSE, if I am not misunderstanding, what you are suggesting is unthinkable, since there's no clear definition of "closest enemy to a group of people"

    We(at least I) don't understand your suggestion, what do you expect us to reply?
    Of course we'd reply to YouzY's suggestion.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
  14. Neoony

    Neoony Member

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, it is pretty clear to me...

    So, you select a group of your infantry (it doesnt really matter if a group or single infantry unit) and you try to give them targets using A and drawing a box and inside that box will be for example 3 enemy infantry units.

    What FN wants is that the CLOSEST enemy unit should be selected as a target to the group/single unit that you have selected instead of making it random targets.

    And in a simple way.
    The closest target will be always selected to your unit/s.

    Iam just thinking that even if there would be a way to do this, there might be problems selecting targets to a group....but nothing is unsolvable
     
  15. Candles

    Candles CAPTAIN CANDLES, DUN DUN DUN, DUN DUN DUN DUN.

    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I believe that's how it's supposed to be, but it's a bit complicated. Jephir(?) posted somewhere how it generally works.
     
  16. Neoony

    Neoony Member

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here it is:

     
  17. Sgt.Security

    Sgt.Security Member

    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
  18. Neoony

    Neoony Member

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Make it so that it will individually give targets even if you select a group of infantry...

    cant be more simple
     
  19. Sgt.Security

    Sgt.Security Member

    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I WISH it's this simple.
    There's more issues but I can't draw 3-D image to show them.


    But if this is really easy to code(I doubt it is), I'd still support this.
    Because if this isn't easy to code, the advantage of implementing this wouldn't be good enough to compensate.
    Single random target <==> Single closest target.
    There's really not much difference, considering enemies are running around.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
  20. Neoony

    Neoony Member

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    A 3d image? For what?
    Making single unit select single closest target is pretty simple to me.
    Really dont know what you wanna do with 3d scenarios, because after all its still only single distance, no calculations necessary...or you must have misunderstood me

    EDIT: It would pretty much just require recoding the method that targets are selected for a group and of course recoding that instead of random targets, the closest one will be selected. But that is my guess as I have no idea how the emp code looks (Iam aware that its extremely messy).
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013

Share This Page