Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by JustGoFly, Oct 31, 2016.
Vote even if you are not a U.S. citizen. Results are private - but percentage is shown.
you only say its private but after the election cia will show up and put me to guantanamo.
i also miss 3rd party votes, because thats what id vote for.
Too bad the third party candidates are also nutters. At least they aren't crooks I guess.
I want to write in a name I don't want either of them Fiorina/ Rubio or other way around
Ten is the limit - so couldn't get Mike Maturen in there.
I think Kasich and Rubio would have to leave the Republican party if they were to continue running. And since I ran out of room Abstain is your only choice if you write someone in.
oh wow awesome. now i got to google all of them ...
you guys dont even have a communist party. free country my ass
canada has two of them for a hilarious reason
which one is the socialist candidate?
Rocky De La Muerte
if the treehugger that voted for jill stein doesnt come forward im throwing a non-biodegradable bag on the ground
Pretty fucked up when the most sane choices are between the political equivalent of a suburban housewife and a fucking libertarian.
Also I vote Jill Stein.
Where is Vermin Supreme in all of this? Always felt that a president should be a paragon, an avatar of sorts if you will, representing qualities and values of his peoples.
to bad i cant vote
i love it when "green" parties that act like they are pro-science and pro-environment actively court the insane vote in anti vaxxers and wifi cancerites and are anti nuclear power in their policies
Did you read the Jill Stein AMA? She sounded batshit insane.
Yeah her answers were a bit weird. Not the election cycle to not vote for a non-main party anyway since the polls are so close. But her anti-nuclear, anti-vac, anti-wifi stance is worrying considering she's meant to be pro-science.
anti vaccination indeed is stupid. i could live without wifi, but its stupid nevertheless.
but anti nuclear energy is smart. aside of that its non renewable either, its an enviromental disaster - and i dont mean in the worst case scenario. its also fucking expensive, because thats whats the only thing most care about.
is it true tho?
i didnt find anyhting about the wifi thing and i believe the anti nucular energy without any proof.
Unless you fuck up with the storage of the leftover material, nuclear energy is hardly polluting.
Expensive? Far as i know its the green energy thats expensive. Also note that you cant really reasonably put stuff everywhere. I for one would be somewhat baffled by placement of easily damaged powerplants in valley of tornados.
No energy source is "renewable" you dolt.
nuclear energy is only "cheap" because its heavily subsidized. and ofc mining and waste disposal cannot just be neglected.
and i didnt coin the term renewable. ofc nothing is renewable. at a point the universe will have expanded so far its at 0K - butthats just not a human issue, at least not atm since if we go on like we do we wont even make it to 2100.
Well, if thats the word that the english use to describe it; though its still stupid.
Separate names with a comma.