give brent a pat on the back, looks nice! also think about giving the wood some engravings for niceness
As said it looks like a real life rifle of the 19 century Its not a close combat weapon like the scout shotgun was intended to be and because the design of both faction undergoes a overhaul atm it might not fit anyway
it could pass for both but a revolver shot gun would be way cooler than a revolver rifle so it should stay shotgun
The problem is its not shotgun like at all, and the day Vess admits he may have screwed up a concept is the day the world ends.
Many people have said in the past that they too think that you think too highly of yourself. That is what I am referring to.
The only difference between a shotgun and a rifle is that the shotgun isn't rifled, it's smoothbore. Other than that they can have exactly the same construction, which is why double barrelled shotguns look like rifles.
dont they have larger barrel openings too? are shotgun bullets not larger then rifle rounds? or am i wrong?
Shotguns fire shells instead of cartridges. Shells are generally filled with shot (hence, shotguns) but you can put anything you want in there; a shotgun could fires live hamsters, for example*. Shotguns generally have bores much larger than rifles, are rarely rifled, and use a large variety of loading mechanisms. Rifles have small bores, are nearly always rifled, and generally stick to loading via bolt. *Not recommended, and hamsters are not guaranteed to survive firing.
Rifles are always rifled, that's why they're called rifles, if they aren't rifled they aren't a rifle. Rifle.
No, because then there are exceptions, and the first statement is incorrect. Murphy's law is not actually true.
Rifles are rifled, Chris made it pretty damn clear, I don't know how else to reiterate it to you. Any time an unrifled barrel is referred to as a rifle, it's being referred to incorrectly. It takes a lot of effort not to call you a moron.
