Haha, lamer. I got multiple triple/ultra kills on that game. Funny, cuz that's the game that cpatton claimed to "wipe" an entire team by himself. Trickster: to be honest, everyone was like that when you first started playing dota/hon/lol (or the billion other varieties in WC3). There is a large learning curve in the game, though it is easier if you play with friends and do what you are told (e.g. play support & conservative, watch how you control lanes and gank, get suggested items and see what other people get, ASK QUESTIONS, etc.). If you are a stubborn person, it is very difficult to get past that barrier. CPatton needs to stop looking at "pro" dota videos and use realistic strategies that actually work in 99.9% of public games.
pro dota games are really good to learn how to deal with certain situations such as a hard lane. Patton just makes bad decisions.
Lol Walmart, I don't know which mid encounter you are talking about then. I remember at least two, one where their team was wiped out, one where I dove for a kill, got it, but didn't make it out (and if it's this one I probably didn't make it out because you and another guy didn't go in on the 1/3 health enemy and kill him fast). But whatever, when I play with aggressive people, I win easy. When I play with you cautious people (which apparently are mostly contained in empires players, because random 5s are usually much better lol) then obv. aggression fails. Also Hamster, this isn't HoN, no MMR dumbass.
That's fine. If it works with a random group of five, that means your are still being paired with/against newbs like yourself that don't know how to work together against basic aggressive tactics. But when you play with Empires players with higher ratings, we get matched with people that actually know how to handle your silly tactics (e.g. carry teleports, bait aggressive gankers like yourself, hero coordination, smoke ganks). As I originally said, once you get to my level, you can play with the big boys. Until then, you can keep using what works best against low-rating newbs at your level. If you are lucky enough to get a string of wins, and you realize in your next game that your strategy doesn't work anymore, you are approaching my level.
Lol, because you assume that a) your strategy is better and b) that 1 loss after a string of wins (a statistically greater likelyhood with every win) requires a need for change of strategy. You don't understand anything about how ratings truly work. Also I love how you don't deny that the reason I died that one time after getting a kill was because you turned away extremely early. Fail change of subject bro.
a) my strategies are better b) no one said that a lose means a change of strategy (though one should reflect on what went wrong). I was referring to a strategy itself not having anymore value. It is not a change of subject if I never accepted it, fool. There are plenty of replays and scoreboards provided by DotA2 illustrating your failure. I don't get into "his word vs my word" arguments when someone like lamer can easily get a screenshot of any of the games and show how much you fail. GOML, bro.
A quick google search will prove that there is indeed hidden mmr that you used to be able to see with console
Plus DotA2 has admitted to a hidden rating system. Though cpatton are a newb so I didn't expect him to know this.
http://www.dota2pro.com/viewtopic.php?f=135&t=1017 This method is now disabled. In an interview, gabe said confirmed there is indeed a rank system and that singsing is the highest ranked player currently in dota 2.
These are the kind of people you play with when I get on my level. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tXn-Vg5Xfk These are the kind of people you play with when you are still at cpatton's level: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5RR-YeVrX0