Short Games or Long?

Discussion in 'Game Play' started by Morcam, Feb 14, 2009.

?

Short or Long?

  1. Short Games

    6 vote(s)
    12.5%
  2. Long Games

    42 vote(s)
    87.5%
  1. Morcam

    Morcam Member

    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you prefer to have a short game or a long one?

    By short I mean that you don't necessarily even get to heavies.
    By long I mean that you probably get to heavies, artillery, and perhaps even nukes.

    Personally, I'd say that longer games are more epic, but shorter games are more intense. I'm a longer game kinda guy.

    What are you?
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2009
  2. ScardyBob

    ScardyBob Member

    Messages:
    3,457
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I only prefer short games when the teams are so obviously unbalanced that a short game is a mercy killing.
     
  3. Dawgas

    Dawgas Banned

    Messages:
    1,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I dislike long games (unless they deserve to be long, such as when both teams are good, and when the game is still fun and not boring)

    of course, with all the removal of powerful weapons, EVERY game is too long (except rare exceptions)
     
  4. Mr. Weedy

    Mr. Weedy I will report bugs on the bug tracker

    Messages:
    2,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Either one as long as the game is good.

    Short games are nice but they may be over too quickly.
    If the game is long and intensive and there's a lot of killing and shooting then that's the best kind of game.

    So... Maybe long games, even in general, because there will be then less rushing and ninjaing because the game lasted so long.
     
  5. communism

    communism poof

    Messages:
    4,095
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Short games rock when they are...epic. But its rare that a shortgame is so sweet that everybody enjoys it, but they do happen. Long games have more tendency to be better for both teams.

    As long as everybody agrees GG at the end of it im happy
     
  6. LordDz

    LordDz Capitan Rainbow Flowers

    Messages:
    5,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Short games = new loading screen + voting time.
    So I prefer longer ;) .
     
  7. McGyver

    McGyver Experimental Pedagogue

    Messages:
    6,533
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Loooong games. Preferably with both teams running out of tickets at last. What's the point of Empires if not the heavy tank battles at the end?
     
  8. Cloud

    Cloud Member

    Messages:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Long games are usually epic, or stalemates.
    The first is win, the second is waiting for arty/heavies.
     
  9. Emp_Recruit

    Emp_Recruit Member

    Messages:
    4,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Assuming both are good games I'd say short. I think most people are voting long because most short games are just stack/whatever clusterfucks. Long games can be fun but drawn out games when both teams are out of tickets can just be a chore or when it gets down to arty spam on slaughtered or xroads.
     
  10. Tovarich Cookie

    Tovarich Cookie Member

    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    long games = painfull clusterfuck.
     
  11. blizzerd

    blizzerd Member

    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i love those games where a team obviously has the upper hand, but is unable to squash down the last parts of resistance the other team is mustering

    if the weaker team wins with tickets, i love it even more
     
  12. zenarion

    zenarion Member

    Messages:
    953
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, those games are fun. It is pretty lame to see yourself on the losing team, not being able to spawn because of the lack of barracks, the only alive player being the com, and he stubbornly refuses to give in and get killed, just so he can have his private GTA:Cyclopean, against the enemy team's tanks.
     
  13. blizzerd

    blizzerd Member

    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    this is why it would seem logical to me that the commander himself is a spawn point of some sort
     
  14. Scikar

    Scikar Member

    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I like long games, not necessarily because they are long but because a long game is a sign of a rare case when the teams aren't stacked.
     
  15. blizzerd

    blizzerd Member

    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    absolutely agree
     
  16. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Long, a short game means one team has been on the defensive for most of the game and hasn't had any fun.
     
  17. blizzerd

    blizzerd Member

    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i prefer being on the defencive, you will see me switch teams often ingame
     
  18. @@@@Marcin@@@@

    @@@@Marcin@@@@ Developer

    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Long games that are verry stressfull for Com!

    I love those games so much adrenaline as com.
     
  19. [PRKL] Werihukka

    [PRKL] Werihukka Member

    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't care how long it takes if I have fun playing most of the time.
     
  20. Fricken Hamster

    Fricken Hamster Mr. Super Serious

    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol com rush into enemy base as super apc, them whole team killspawns and wins, (or fails and lose)
     

Share This Page