Definitive Cheap Particles

Discussion in 'General' started by Empty, Nov 14, 2010.

  1. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No.
    If your graphics card can't run the current particles then it's a terrible piece of shit that should be using the square particles.
    If your card doesn't seem to be that old, then there's another issue causing your FPS drop, did you try tweaking graphics settings, resolution etc.
     
  2. w00kie

    w00kie Mustachioed Mexican

    Messages:
    3,863
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look into this thread:
    FPS in Empires

    just do that and please post the results from console and your system specs. Maybe u wanna try the timedemo with different particles etc.
    but please give comparable results before u bitch more about particles.
     
  3. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wookie has gained 50 points of reputation with empty.
     
  4. w00kie

    w00kie Mustachioed Mexican

    Messages:
    3,863
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
  5. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol tbh, that demo is not very useful for a fps stress test. It isn't first person and it stays far away from battles where all the smoke and models are. I have some screenshots to show you what i encounter with these new particles.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    And this isn't even an intense battle. When I shoot, it makes it hard for me to control and aim my tank due to the fps drop. The point is I had no problem in the earlier versions of empires. What I'm looking for is just simpler particles, though not the ones in this thread because I had better ones with better fps. There are other offending particles like grenade explosions, etc.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2011
  6. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'll update this pack later, maybe in the next day or so.

    I'll fix up tracers too.
     
  7. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thank you very much. I'll try to get a better card when i can :p
     
  8. recon

    recon SM Support Dev

    Messages:
    2,348
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Any progress Empty? My 9400 GT needs less demanding particles.
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2011
  9. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :( still waiting....
     
  10. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Working on it now.
     
  11. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
  12. MOOtant

    MOOtant Member

    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You should add low cost particle effects to default build. Every particle effect can have lower cost verison and engine will choose which one to use on demand. It works with sv_pure where manual modification of .pcf files does not.
     
  13. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yea, every commercial game has the choice of level of particles. Also, the squares are too big and block my view. Why can't you just use the 2.25 particles, they were fine for me :/ Could I override the particles in 2.30 with particles from 2.25?
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2011
  14. Trickster

    Trickster Retired Developer

    Messages:
    16,576
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can't override the 2.25 particles, I know that much.
     
  15. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    2.25 particles were hardcoded.
    I keep saying it but nobody listens.
     
  16. Trickster

    Trickster Retired Developer

    Messages:
    16,576
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Weren't they 2.24d and earlier. I thought 2.25 was the first overhaul. I also thought they were supposed to be much laggier than anything we have now.
     
  17. Demented

    Demented Member

    Messages:
    2,337
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have a number of backup'd 2.25 .pcfs. I'm pretty sure that's when Chris made his pyrotechnicy bullet tracers too (since I wasn't around for 2.26-2.28).
     
  18. Empty

    Empty Member

    Messages:
    14,912
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ohhhhh.
    Still, those particles were way unoptimised. These ones are better, smoke is much less intensive up close and they should fade out at certain distances.
     
  19. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sigh...then there's nothing I can do now. The game is now unplayable for me for the first time. I sure as hell didn't get any drastic drops in fps when I fired my tank cannon or arty cannon last time... Thanks for your help anyway. Couldn't you just reduce the density of the particles somehow to like 10 percent? lol
     
  20. w00kie

    w00kie Mustachioed Mexican

    Messages:
    3,863
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    @Iselore. have u tried disabling paralax mapping instead of focusing on particles?
     

Share This Page