Empires Forum CPU comparison

Hi guys,


I'm interested in what CPUs we have in this community and how fast they are compared to my Skylake i5. So why not compare them for the lulz?

1. Download Cinebench R15 here: http://www.heise.de/download/cinebench.html
2. Unzip to a folder of your preference
3. Start the program and go to File - Advanced benchmark. Check it.
4. Run the multicore benchmark.
5. Run the single core benchmark.
6. Optional: Run the Open GL benchmark
7. Make a screenshot and upload it
8. Post results and a link to the screenshot here

My results:

737p multi-core
191p single-core
151.38 fps Open GL



i5@4.4ghz

Top Scores:

single core:
1. McGyver 191 i5 6600K 4,4
2. Wookie 182 i5 6600K 4,3
3. Fooshi 170 i7 4790K
4. Dz 144 i5 4690K 3,5
5. CyberKiller 113 I5 760 3,8
6. Lazybum 106 i5 2520M
7. Viroman 97 FX-8350
8. wealthysoup 94 I7 950 3,1
9. Neoony 92 Phenom II 965
10. Viro 91 FX-4300 3,8
11. Shitstorm 82 I7 920 2,7
12. Neoony 79 Phenom II 965 3,4
13. Dragown 64 Q8300 2,5


multi core:
1. Mootant 1004 5820K
2. Fooshi 833 i7 4790K
3. McGyver 737 i5 6600K
4. Wookie 680 i5 6600K
5. Viroman 550 FX-8350
6. Dz 526 i5 4690K
7. wealthysoup 458 I7 950
8. CyberKiller 434 I5 760
9. Shitstorm 419 I7 920
10. Grantrithor 406 FX-6300
11. Neoony 345 Phenom II 965
12. Neoony 320 Phenom II 965
13. Viro 294 FX-4300
14. Lazybum 250 i5 2520M
15. Dragown 241 Q8300
16. Critawakets 237 Athlon II 640

 

104mb so I can post a picture? Its a bit much don't you think?

 

I wasn't aware that 104MB is a problem in 2015.

 

It is to those poor who have dial up for various reasons. Thankfully Not me. However it still upsetting that it takes up so much space for such a short test. Like wtf? Also, wtf at the results... says I have 2 cores not 4?

 

I think it's more like I don't want your adware m8

 

Why bother with downloading anything instead of just writing down what you have in your computer?

 

I wanted to test my 4.9Ghz OC, but the profile wouldn't load and I can't be arsed finding the settings again.

 

Because that would be smart and this is not what people are.

 

Because its interesting to see how fast the CPUs are in single/multi-threaded applications with overclocks that people here use for gaming.

I tried to select a good and trusted download location, should not have adware at all.

 

Due to Bulldozer's architecture, which pairs two cores in a "module" with shared cache, some programmes identify those cores as threads and the modules as the cores. Thus making the 4XXX, 6XXX and 8XXX series dual, triple and quad cores. Technically they are quad, hexa and octa, but people are people and shit like this will bring my nerds to the yard, and damn right, they wanna discuss cores.

 

Guys my computer is awesome!



Have fun with all the tech e-peen measuring while I'm gone.

 

Im suprised that after all those years people give any shit about what mcgyver says about electronics.

 

Only did one prtscr and couldn't be fucked running the benchmarks again.

 

My first generation core i5 is still doing quite well. (1ghz overclock too though)

 

Grant ... you missed a step.

Also... why did my 770 beat your 970? Hmm GPU boss says 3Dmark 770 kicks the shit out of 970 wtf? Your video card is not for gaming?

 

probably because I'm not on a 970

 

if you mean grant, thats a 960 not 970. Power of 3,5 gb/

 

not a 970... oic... Duno how I misread that. Still your 960 is much crappier then mine.