PillBox

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by Vessboy, Mar 10, 2008.

?

Do you want a Pillbox/Bunker/Whatever in empires

  1. HELL YES!!!! WE NEED IT!!!

    80.0%
  2. NO!!! (and im gay)

    20.0%
  1. Vessboy

    Vessboy Member

    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Walls, every one has em no one uses them. I mean of course commanders. Walls are a great stratiegic element in clasc maps. but they are rarely usesd to thier fullest efect, IE turning a camp into a compound. The main reson for this is simply: walls are a two way trap.
    Others have tried to sudgest gates and ramps to help with this however these ideas have been shot down.
    Others have tried to sudgest bunkers and towers to aid with the compound theroy only to be turrend down again and again.

    I now present my solution to all these problems.
    The pill box
    [​IMG]
    Upgraded from a completed wall segment by the commander. Designed to complement walled parimeters by allowing cover and concielment to defenders. Vulnerable on 3 sides. With an open crows nest grenidiers are capible of use with out blowing them selves up from trying to aim through the slits.​

    Pros:
    -promotes structured base compounds witch adds to game atmosphear.
    -supports(protects) infentry use durring vehical attacks.

    Cons:
    -turtling
    -camping
    -any other annoying defensive stratigys

    Alternitives:
    -walls with gunner slits pre modles into them
    -raised platforms on one side of the wall
    -towers
    -bunkers
    -mannable turrets
    -ramps
    -gates
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2008
  2. angry hillbilly

    angry hillbilly Member

    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think its enevitable that some sort of defenve building is going to be added. I think it has to be the No1 sujestion on this forum. Empieres does severly lack the defenceive. I like this idea cus it would allow u to finaly get cover from walls without some dick starting building them. ^^
     
  3. Superlagg

    Superlagg Member

    Messages:
    620
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No bunkers!
     
  4. Vessboy

    Vessboy Member

    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Shut up
     
  5. Richards

    Richards Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think it could work out for turtling. A tweak for it could be that it might take much time to build, but oppositely it should have a lot of strength so it can withstand a lot of bombardment. This could prevent it from being used to push forward and makes it useful when the base is under siege. If the bunker is as small as you drew it, it might turn out to be a somewhat discrete fortification. Is that somewhat how you envisioned it Vessboy?

    Not sure if it'll ever get added, bit it is interesting.
     
  6. communism

    communism poof

    Messages:
    4,095
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol

    Washing machine
     
  7. Cokemonkey11

    Cokemonkey11 Member

    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    no please - idk why people dont think there are already good empires defense strats....
     
  8. dizzyone

    dizzyone I've been drinking, heavily

    Messages:
    5,771
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    how would a player get in the top position?
     
  9. -Mayama-

    -Mayama- MANLY MAN BITCH

    Messages:
    6,487
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i want
     
  10. Vessboy

    Vessboy Member

    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1)ladder
    2)stairs
    3)ramp
    whitch ever is simplest.
     
  11. Superlagg

    Superlagg Member

    Messages:
    620
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1) Impossible.
    2) Too much area needed.
    3) Same as 2, but with less polygons.
     
  12. Vessboy

    Vessboy Member

    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]

    Hows this for too much area needed.
    Pecimist!
     
  13. ViroMan

    ViroMan Black Hole (*sniff*) Bully

    Messages:
    8,382
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ohh ohh ohh... I know..(raises hand) because they don't want to make it, so they just spew out negative comments.

    1) I think he is right on that one. ladders are map placed props and not dynamic.

    2)Stairs? too much area? well when you make stairs with walls, doesn't that take up more area?

    3)Same as 2, but with less polygons. :p
     
  14. petemyster

    petemyster Member

    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    tbh, we need battle fortresses from RA2 :D

    na, i like the idea of bunker. BUT the the slit in the bunker means the person inside will need to stand up meaning he couldn't spray away with his HMG like a pill box does. So either a human manable gun or a flat service where the person can go prone on it and shoot out (but that would just look ugly) :D
     
  15. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's a bunker, and using walls to create 'compounds' is really silly, because the way empires works, you're much better off having total mobility in your base rather than walling it off.

    Walls are only useful for sealing chokepoints and protecting structures from rocket sniping, which they do very well in both instances, they do not work well for base defence, and you're not going to change that by adding bunkers.
     
  16. Metal Smith

    Metal Smith Member

    Messages:
    4,520
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Empires is a constant offensive, and when you are forced to play defensively, you will eventually lose.

    The goals are to kill the enemy and kill the enemy com. Both those are offensive objectives. The main purpose of walls is to protect from vehicles, as infantry can easily destroy them in literally seconds.
     
  17. Sherbie

    Sherbie Member

    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If one team is attacking a location, the other would have to defend it, obviously. :P

    And ideally, while one part of the team attacks... the other defends. And what would be better to add something like this?

    It could also be used offensively. I think it would be enough if the players would have to build up the wall first, then the commander could instant upgrade it. Just allow a maximum of 4 of these puppies and make them cost like ~90 res, otherwise they'd be used much too carlessly.

    However, I dislike the lower window, cause it would enable scouts to snipe from there with perfect accuracy... A window that's on crouch height would be best, and if the scout still wants to prone he can get on the roof of the segment, where he can be counter-sniped more easily.!
     
  18. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What usually happens is that a full on offensive either takes a location, or meets another enemy full on offensive and you get a skirmish, you don't get attackers and defenders in this game for very long, as the attackers invariably win in that instance, the only exception is escort, which is because of the map design.

    Most maps, however, are designed to be purely offensive.
     
  19. ningleepo

    ningleepo Banned

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can turtle for as long as you want, but the longer you turtle the better the chance of getting artillery raped.
     
  20. Chris0132'

    Chris0132' Developer

    Messages:
    9,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you actually can't turtle for as long as you want then?
     

Share This Page