Based off what I've seen, it doesn't have the atmosphere of the first Diablo. So most likely no. Also, you tried typing tres, but you subconsciously wanted three, so you split the difference and got thres.
I find it kinda boring. Minus the kinda. It really needs the multiplayer that'll come with #2. Then, yeah, it should be pretty rad, man.
Don't feel like wasting my life doing baal-run bullcrap, even though it looks really promising. I think the main reason many gamers don't want to touch D3 is that it looks like a bunch of rainbowy unicorn fagsalads did the design, instead of the dark ambience of the first 2.
i dont like diablo, never did, but i think you are wrong. blizzard most certainly tried to capture the general look of d/d2. they also did with sc and wc3 and hell even wow looks like warcraft. if blizzard is good at anything its at the artistic aspect. you neglect that its 12 years, thats two eternities in computer time. a lot of the "better suited" graphics was your imagination 12 years ago.
I think I might take another look at it. Some of my friends that bought it said that it really captures the grim and dirty feel of the original Diablo, despite the new artistic direction.
The one thing I hate most about this game is the constant internet connection you need in order to play, can't even play it offline without internet.
someone explain me why people think diablo 3 is good, cause I just watched some gplay videos and it's just boring as hellll
If you want a more grim, gritty and dirty feel, turn your contrast and brightness down, and for added immersion, put some dirt on your screen and over your hands and face. Sorted.
And by that you would discriminate Catalans, Basques and Galicians you monster! BTW: I just realized Blizzard wants 60€ for a digital copy of Diablo III. WTF are they smoking?
yeah on the internet the exchange rate is 1$ = 1€, valve does it all the time on steam. Great to know i'm living on the cheaper side.
