Barracks VS Barracks

VS

 

the first one isn't mobile is it?

 

no.

With a few alterations (dug in look, better placed exits) the 1st one would be really good, having a mix of tank buildings and sandbag/semi-permanent buildings would be an awesome style for NF.

 

Can you throw grenades into those holes on the second one?

In any case with some sandbags and barrels around the first one it would be an awsome style. It should be clear that the thing doesn't still run though to avoid "how to drive the people tank???"

The second one is good too, allthough I think if you chopped it in half it would make a sweet armory/bunker.

 

first one hands down

 

IDEA.

Remove the physbox for the windows, that way grenades can be thrown to kill those incestuous engineers.

Buuuuuuut because the second one looks awesome, +2nd

 

I like them both : /

 

Tank style is winning yay.

 

Noes!
Bunker FTW!

 

Democracy is awesome when it supports my argument.

 

now you are just being annoyingly arrogant... :/

 

That's more a joke at vess because I make fun of him listening to what other people think.

 

Tank style sucks to look at, imo. But i'm not gonna go to war over it

 

LOOK OVER THERE, ITS THE ENEMY! GET HIM GUYS!

 

I LOVE that bunker. It looks completely awesome. I guess the tank would be cool too if you did it up like the British trucks in Company of Heroes, but the bunker is far better.

 

The first one, if you'll be able to waltz on top of it like ya can with the BE one, or be able to hurl nades through the windows.

 

proves how shit the current one is, 4 out of 23 votes. TBH, either would be really good and far better than what we have now.

 

use the first one for the rax (after a few alterations to make it look as non-mobile as possible) and the bunker one for an armory

 

Pfft...you don't have enough manpower

 

Tanks style.

Like the idea of a fast deployable mobile barrack.