2.24d particle pack

Discussion in 'Art' started by Vulkanis, Feb 7, 2011.

  1. Vulkanis

    Vulkanis Banned

    Messages:
    2,490
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can we have a particle pack from 2.24d included in the offical release and make the more intensive ones optional?
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2011
  2. Trickster

    Trickster Retired Developer

    Messages:
    16,576
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, don't be a dumbass. The old ones were hardcoded into the game, they weren't proper particle systems. On top of that, they're smaller and have less visblocking, so people would use them to gain an advantage.

    Mayama has been testing, and particles aren't the FPS drain problem, people are just blaming it on that. Changing to DX8 and keeping the particles proves this. It's something else, and we're looking for it. But stop blaming particles.
     
  3. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hmm, you force this new big black smoke and reduces fps to the pits and when people want to use back the smoke which were fine for all previous versions, you call them trying use an advantage? I don't like this reasoning. The smoke doesn't really make the opponent invisible to you! That's the point. If you want the smoke to block people's views then do so! Not inbetween. I'm not using the word particles anymore anyway.

    The problem only became very bad for me around 2.30, I might have missed a patch or two. I know it because I took a long time off Empires and when I came back I was shocked at how bad the tank fights were. I could barely control my tank at close quarters and so I was forced to come here and rant. As you know, games are different from real life, it should be playable. For people like us, reverting to these new fancy smoke particles have no advantage for us! 60 fps to 20 fps is not the same as 100 fps to 60 fps.

    I dunno if you actually bother about us with the lousy computers at all. Mine is lousy but others maybe not.
    It's sad if Empires were to actually lose players to some fancy smoke effects. If you insist that using those modified packs are cheating then I can't play anymore. I've been playing for all versions since 2.30 btw.

    Probably what we need now is just a simple pack using old smoke effects from maybe pre-2.30 to shut us up. I'm trying to compare 2.25 and 2.30 and the modified particle pack and so far the results have been convincing.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2011
  4. LordDz

    LordDz Capitan Rainbow Flowers

    Messages:
    5,221
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Isolore, did you even read Tricksters' post?
     
  5. complete_

    complete_ lamer

    Messages:
    6,438
    Likes Received:
    144
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i just dont like smoke because its fucking dumb and annoying
     
  6. Deletejohnson

    Deletejohnson Banned

    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    agreed
     
  7. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, I read his post. I'm not dumb. But we have to agree it's the smoke effect definitely. The major difference between 2.25 and 2.30 is mostly the new smoke effects. There are minor fps drops from the new explosive effects too. The problem with these new effects is that they cause low fps through the duration of the effect. However, the old ones only cause low fps for maybe 1/3 of the effect. It's because the smoke also lingers longer. Something like this:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2011
  8. Trickster

    Trickster Retired Developer

    Messages:
    16,576
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Whilst the particles do affect very very low end systems, most of the FPS problems people are having currently aren't particle related. I too dislike the smoke, but not from an FPS perspective, just simply because it gets in my way, although I've started trying to use it to my advantage, and that's actually been pretty fun. But I still wouldn't object to it being removed. But having separate effects where one set of effects blocks your vision less is unacceptable, and repeating that effect but lowering your FPS less is incredibly difficult to do. Like I said, I don't mind it being removed, but you can stop whining about getting a separate set of advantageous particles, because that certainly won't happen.
     
  9. .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329

    .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329 Member

    Messages:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    agreed i'm not arguing over fps now that i got a new computer but could we please have a little less smoke?
     
  10. Deiform

    Deiform Member

    Messages:
    2,492
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can we get rid of the arty and nade smoke in exchange for extreme shaking of the hud?
     
  11. Trickster

    Trickster Retired Developer

    Messages:
    16,576
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    code effort excuse etc
     
  12. MOOtant

    MOOtant Member

    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Be specific. You have r_part*/mat_part/cl_part* cvars and cmds to control particles. You can measure time game spent simulating and rendering specific particle effects. It doesn't even require cheats to be on. Attach particle profiler output and we can optimize specific effects and not just try to improve 200 of them just because you get slow down with 1 of them.
     
  13. .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329

    .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329 Member

    Messages:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i rather have smoke than shaking of the hud.
    let's just remove the fucking smoke. if you want smoke, throw some smoke grenades or some shit
     
  14. Foxy

    Foxy I lied, def a Forum Troll

    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ...Wait, wait. What.

    Tis current version. If you only just joined us, how can you compare anything? Logical derp.

    Also, unlabelled graph axis! We don't need your kind around here.
     
  15. -=]Kane[=-

    -=]Kane[=- Member

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hurp durp graphs, but that's pretty much the same I said about any of all these new smoke sources, the first new nuke impact effect, too, but to a faaar lesser contend as the arty impact effect, while 1 effect is nice, as longer as it lasts as more effects get drawn upon each other and everywhere. A 2 seconds smoke screen for an arty shell .... bleh ... but most of them are fine now, for me anyway, since I can effort a new PC once in a half decade. :rolleyes::p

    If you want to test if the particles are causing it, use the cheap particle set empty made, if it still works ...
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2011
  16. .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329

    .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329 Member

    Messages:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    the lag isn't really the issue, can we just have particles with less smoke please? all this smoke kinda gets really annoying; and sometimes, just to piss of your teamates, you can random shoot he and nukes at them, and some of them with old computers lag like crazy, while those with newer ones have to endure basically an extremely concentrated but ephemeral smoke grenade
     
  17. Dubee

    Dubee Grapehead

    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is there a reason for hella smoke so we can't see all the cool destruction and flames and flying bodies? The smoke is blocking some cool ass visuals. Maybe in the empires world smoke doesn't exist.
     
  18. .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329

    .:.HeXi.:. emcalex329 Member

    Messages:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yea, like some of the visuals are actually really cool, but the thing is, the fucking smoke makes it so that you can't even see the visuals that are causing the smoke in the first place :\
    please, just from a gameplay perspective, could we please have less smoke in our particles?
     
  19. Iselore

    Iselore Member

    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well now people with better computers are having an advantage over people with lousier computers. At least back then, the playing field was more even. Doesn't it make sense? Ah, anyway, I'll just use one of those improved particle packs to play in the meanwhile.
     
  20. flasche

    flasche Member Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    13,299
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    0
    smoke and particles that look like pieces of ground (esp visible for arties) create the immersion of real explosions on real battlefields (i know its far from realistic, we dont want it realistic and that realisticly the smoke would last way longer ...)

    computer games are only as good as immersive their controlls, graphics, sounds and general game mechanics are. do you remember when we had no dynamic lights when weapons where fired? it added a lot, sure its also helpful to determine where enemies are, but the best was that the enviroment got lit, creating a better impression of fighting on an actual battlefield.

    the smoke is good, learn to live with it, learn to exploit it to your advantage. hopefully sv_pure will be standard on servers after the steam release so noone can cheat their way around ...
     

Share This Page