awww.. don't go around showing your mad face because no one said happy birthday yesterday.... ps.... happy after-birthday.
The video you posted was neither the official video nor did it had the activist group's statement. Reread my posts again Are we going in circles? I mean, why do both of us need to sound like a broken record
not reading my posts my video and yours were not the official video at all. they both did have the statement and video though. maybe watch the video (like i said to) and you'll see a statement that exactly matches the one posted in the description of your video. so look another thing you got proven wrong about ive already addressed your posts. now you arn't even answering me you said the firebombing had to do with the g20. i said it had to do with the olympics, homelessness, native land etc. if you watch the video you'll see that im right. have fun replying to my post with nothing of value again
Then point out where wiki was wrong that it was related to the G-20... But you didn't. The wiki passage, based off the video, said it was all of the above. Why do you think they are mutually exclusive? Until my internet is up, I'll make the best out of this :D
plenty of people did also, i was just bored last night (or 7:27 in the morning to be exact...) and decided to post some random disagree motivationals and see if complete would bait, but he went offline =(
Fuck that. I'm going to be the biggest man by puling a dubee and never stop taling. Especially when you are right Canadians just can't accept they go apeshit over every little thing like some Europeans. Sure, there are idiots in the USA, but it usually doesn't involve destroying a town.
i belive the entire paragraph titled "Ottawa firebombing" should not be included as part of the article on the g20 protests. it might deserve a mention when talking about the spending on security, though. they were not present at the protests, and they were never mentioned again during and after the protests. this was a nonstory that was put on wikipedia by a random guy. i believe they are exclusive because it happened beforehand and in the video it spends 9/10 of the time talking about my points, before mentioning that they will be present at the g20. why do you think they arn't mutually exclusive? ive already pointed out that i dont care about your dumbass 4chan posters. what more is there to say. dont you have some bipolar bitches to fuck or something.
you say every little thing. but we've been arguing about 1 thing for the past 3 pages. surely, you'd have something else by now?
It is the same thing. I noticed you didn't reply to my questions about your out-of-context quote from wiki :p
i did reply to your question. you just didnt make yourself clear enough. you say "point out where the wiki was wrong" and i say "the paragraph about the ottawa firebombing" so make yourself clear. what do you want me to answer?
My argument is that both of them lead to derpshit riots. As for your last reply, lamer, my response is "derp".
Hey walmart what about the Boston tea party way back in the day, where a bunch of people in Boston started going apeshit because they weren't shipping tea to Boston (I actually don't know what the inciting force was) but I heard that riot they had lead to the whole country going apeshit where they made their own country made up of a bunch of smaller countries. Like honestly you are only talking about two things in where we got a little out of hand, can't compare to the full retard soccer riots in England where they were disqualified from the cup(and not allowed to enter for a few years), and the retarded things people do in the states; Which are more retarded than what we do here, like burning books about wizards and sueing fast food restaurants for making you guys fat.
Backtrack and reread my posts I made a distinction between just stupid shit and stupid shit that leads to destroying your own town. You are trying too hard if you are going to recycle talking points for... what, the 4th time?